Excel, MS Project or cplace? What modern project teams really need

Project landscapes are growing, timelines are getting tighter, and at the same time the requirements for transparency, agility and controllability are increasing. While some teams are still working with Excel spreadsheets or traditional Gantt charts, others are already using agile boards or hybrid methods - but often in parallel and without real integration.

The result: information is available, but scattered. Processes are running, but not synchronized. And as soon as priorities shift or new dependencies arise, there is no overview. Planning reliability? Not a chance.

But there are solutions that combine classic project planning with agile principles and at the same time enable standardized data flows. Without changing tools, without losing control.

Why the "tool mix" is no longer sufficient

Many teams fall back on tools that they are familiar with - often out of habit rather than conviction. Excel is flexible, MS Project is powerful, other tools support agile working methods. However, as soon as you try to combine these tools, breaks occur:

• Data is available in different formats
• Information is distributed across several systems
• Communication takes place via emails, Excel sheets, boards and meetings - in parallel
  
  

This quickly becomes confusing, especially in a multi-project environment. It is no longer enough to think in isolation. Teams have to work iteratively and manage reliable schedules and dependencies at the same time. Agility and traditional planning are not mutually exclusive - if the right tool is used.

Excel - flexible, but fragmented

Excel is the "all-purpose weapon" for project work in many organizations. For small projects, initial overviews or simple task distribution, it is quickly at hand and can be customized.

But therein lies the problem: everyone builds their own system.

What still works on a small scale quickly leads to versioning chaos in a larger context: different file statuses, saved locally, updated manually - no one knows which file is the current one. The single source of truth (SSOT) is missing.

Gantt charts are also difficult to implement - using bar charts or complicated formulas. As soon as dependencies or deadlines change, manual rework begins. Cross-team work or parallel projects? In Excel, only with a lot of discipline - and often with double data maintenance.

In short: Excel is a tool - but not a system.

MS Project - powerful, but rigid

MS Project is the classic solution for project-related time planning in many companies. Those who work with waterfall structures or plan in a highly linear fashion benefit from the clear structure, dependencies and critical path.

However, modern project work is rarely linear. Teams work iteratively, coordinate regularly and react to changes at short notice. This is precisely where MS Project reaches its limits: Agile methods are difficult to integrate. Agile boards or daily structures are not provided for. Collaboration between several teams with different rhythms also often requires workarounds or additional tools - which again leads to tool breaks.

In short: MS Project is a planning system - but not an agile working environment.

cplace - Agile and plannable: no contradiction

cplace starts exactly where other tools reach their limits. With the combination of Gantt charts, Kanban boards and the timeboxing feature, classic planning methods and agile working methods can be seamlessly combined.

• The Gantt charts in cplace offer classic planning with milestones, dependencies and project structure - but flexible, customizable and usable across teams.
• The Kanban boards enable teams to continue working in an agile way - with user stories, sprints or workflows directly in the system.
• The timeboxing feature allows the structural integration of sprints, increments or phases into the time planning - an agile element in a classically plannable framework. → Find out more about timeboxing in cplace (link to article about timeboxing).
  
  

This close integration creates a uniform, consistent system that avoids tool breaks, reduces redundancies and enables real transparency in real time - across teams, projects and levels.

In short: cplace is a system - for planning and collaboration.

How the tools differ in hybrid project management

The following overview shows in direct comparison how differently the three tools support key requirements in the hybrid project environment - and where their respective strengths and limitations lie:

Conclusion: modern projects need hybrid tools

The overview clearly shows that neither Excel nor MS Project alone meet all the requirements that modern, hybrid project teams need today. Excel offers flexibility, but suffers from fragmentation and a lack of collaboration. MS Project offers classic planning expertise, but is often too rigid for agile methods.

cplace, on the other hand, combines the best of both worlds: With seamlessly integrated Gantt charts, Kanban boards and timeboxing, it supports both classic scheduling and agile working methods - all on a standardized platform that enables transparency and collaboration in real time.

If you are also looking for a solution that combines agility and planning reliability, it's worth taking a look at cplace.

Interested?

Would you like to find out more about how cplace can revolutionize your project work? We support you with experience, best practices and a clear goal - to make your digital implementation more successful.

Contact us for a personal consultation or a non-binding demo!

CONTACT US NOW!